Powerfully Persuasive Pro-Life Response

Press Release by

Staff

(Ann Arbor, Michigan) – On April 10, 2024, attorneys for the Great Lakes Justice Center and the American Freedom Law Center, filed a powerfully persuasive response to the government’s effort to dismiss a federal lawsuit challenging a radical unfettered pro-abortion / anti-parent sexuality provision now in the State Constitution, due in part from the support and funds of out-of state citizens.

The lawsuit, filed on behalf of sixteen pro-life plaintiffs, challenges Article I, § 28 of the Michigan Constitution, on federal constitutional grounds. The pro-life plaintiffs include, among others, Right to Life Michigan, the American Association of Pro-life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, members of the State Legislature, Christian Medical and Dental Associations, Crossroads Care Center, a physician, two moms, and parents with children in public schools.

The defendants in the case are Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, and Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson.

As set forth in the pro-life / pro parent response, § 28 improperly creates an extra-constitutional super-right to “reproductive freedom” that is exceedingly harmful to women and children.  Indeed, this new constitutional provision operates as a Trojan Horse for a leftist radical pro-abortion and “gender-reassignment” agenda . . . and worse.

The proponents of Proposal 3 falsely claimed that it would simply “restore Roe.”  It does not such thing.  The pro-lifers’ response lays bare the pernicious effects of this state constitutional amendment.

As set forth in the response, Article I, § 28 runs afoul of the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Guarantee Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

More specifically, the pro-lifer / pro parent response forcefully demonstrates that § 28:

  • violates the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment by depriving women and children of the equal protection of the law,
  • eviscerates parental rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment,
  • deprives pro-life medical professionals of their rights to the free exercise of religion and freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment,
  • deprives unborn life of equal protection and due process guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, and
  • deprives Michigan residents of their right to a representative form of government protected by the Guarantee Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

The lawsuit seeks a declaration that § 28 violates the U.S. Constitution and an injunction enjoining its enforcement.

More On

This Issue