Law and Policy Update: March – April 2025

Update by

Prof. William Wagner

WFFC Distinguished Chair for Faith & Freedom at SAU

Issue brief

Updated April 1, 2025

This update includes a summary of Federal and State actions impacting Christian people.  It also includes a prayer guide we pray you will find beneficial.

Matters Pending Before U.S. Congress and State Legislature

Many matters pending before the U.S. Congress and your State Legislature impact Christian people.

Legislative Trackers


Good Governance 
Protecting marriage & family 
Value of Human Life 
Religious Liberty 
(1 Peter 2:13-17)(Genesis 2:24; Psalm 127:3)(Genesis 1:27)(Jude 1:3-4)

Note the special color-coded feature indicating whether the proposed law reinforces, is neutral toward, or contradicts our core values. We’ve also added a feature to let you know if a particular piece of legislation is actively moving.

In the Highest Courts of the Land

Where the highest courts in the land addressed issues impacting faith and freedom, we are there.

U.S. Supreme Court Cases

  • Chiles v Salazar (24-539) representing state legislators (e.g., CO, MI)  Whether a law that censors conversations between counselors and their clients based on the viewpoints expressed violates the First Amendment?
  • Oliver v City of Brandon (25-000) representing ISKCON. Whether ordinance violates First and Fourteenth Amendment rights by limiting a person’s ability to evangelize in public spaces.
  • Lindsey v. Whitmer (24-1017) Petition for Writ of Certiorari representing state legislators. Whether state legislators have standing to challenge unconstitutional actions by the executive branch in violation of the Election Clause.
  • Mahmoud v Taylor (religious parents prohibited from opting their young children out of state mandated LGBTQ indoctrination at school) Read the Brief Here
  • Coalition Life v. Carbondale (24-57) (representing Life Legal Defense, Right to Life (MI); and the Wagner Center) Brief filed in support of Petitioner challenging law making it a crime to express a pro-life viewpoint on the topic of abortion while on a public sidewalk in proximity to an abortion clinic.  Whether the Court should overrule the holding in Hill v. Colorado that improperly enables government to prohibit and punishing speech with which it disagrees — and why the doctrine of stare decisis does not require adherence to the incorrect holding of that case? Read Prof. Wagner’s Supreme Court Brief Here.
  • Little v. Hecox (24-38) (representing university president and the Wagner Center) Brief filed in support of Petition for Certiorari seeking to protect women in sports.  Whether Men should be allowed to compete against women in women’s sports?
  • West Virginia v. BPJ (24-43) (representing university president and the Wagner Center) Brief filed in support of Petition for Certiorari seeking to protect women in sports.  Whether Men should be allowed to compete against women in women’s sports? Read Prof. Wagner’s Supreme Court Brief Here.
  • FDA et al. v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al. (23-235) (2024) Read Prof. Wagner’s Supreme Court Brief Here
  • Danco Laboratories v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al. (23-236)(2024) (representing Ob/Gyn physicians and the Wagner Faith & Freedom Center) Brief filed supporting a consolidated challenge to FDA authorization of a drug designed with the singular purpose of killing an innocent human life.
  • We the Patriots USA, et al. v Connecticut Office of Early Childhood Development, et al. (23-643) (2024) (representing Wagner Faith & Freedom Center) Brief filed in support of religious people challenging government action requiring them to be vaccinated in violation of their sincerely held religious conscience due to the vaccine’s development connection with abortion.
  • Moyle, Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives et al. v. United States (23-726) (2024) representing Stanton International). Brief filed opposing federal action requiring physicians to perform elective abortions.
  • Debra A. Vitagliano v. County of Westchester, N.Y. (23-74) (2023) (representing Wagner Faith & Freedom Center and Right to Life – MI). Brief filed in support of Petitioner challenging law making it a crime to express a pro-life viewpoint on the topic of abortion while on a public sidewalk in proximity to an abortion clinic.  Whether the Court should overrule the holding in Hill v. Colorado that improperly enables government to prohibit and punishing speech with which it disagrees — and why the doctrine of stare decisis does not require adherence to the incorrect holding of that case?
  • Brian Tingley v. Attorney General of Washington (22-942) (2023) (representing Wagner Faith & Freedom Center) Brief filed in support of professional counselor where state interfered with the counselor’s First Amendment liberty by requiring him to renounce his Christian expression, conscience, identity, and beliefs, or face professional discipline.  Whether the free exercise of religious expression is a fundamental constitutional right that limits generally applicable government laws?
  • College of the Ozarks v. Joe Biden, et al., (22-816) (2023). (representing Wagner Faith & Freedom Center and the American Association of Christian Schools), Brief filed in support of Christian University where state interfered with the free exercise of religious conscience by requiring Christian universities to allow biological men identifying as women to shower and room with biological women. Whether the government conduct here (failing to give statutorily required notice and hearing so as to allow citizen participation in the government’s rule-making) provides sufficient reason to challenge the government action?

U.S. Court of Appeals Cases

  • Littlejohn v. School Bd of Leon Co. FLA (23-10385) (en banc)(11th Cir) Parental Rights Foundation amicus in support of parents. Whether the District Court erred in ruling that the right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children is not clearly established as a fundamental right?
  • State of TN; Christian Educators Assoc v Cardona (6th Cir) (24-5588) Brief filed in support of defining sex base on a person’s objective biology rather than self-identified gender.
  • Kansas v. U.S. Dept of Ed. (10th Cir) Brief filed in support of defining sex base on a person’s objective biology rather than self-identified gender.
  • State of LA v U.S. Dept of Ed. (5th Cir) Brief filed in support of defining sex base on a person’s objective biology rather than self-identified gender.
  • Sacred Heart of Jesus v Dana Nessel, et al. (23-1781) Wagner Faith & Freedom Center amicus in support of appellant religious school.  1) Operating a Religious Organization in Accordance with that Organization’s Religious Doctrine is Not Invidious, Irrational or Arbitrary Discrimination; 2) Ministerial Employees are the “Lifeblood” of a Religious Organization Because They are Critical to the Organization’s Ability to Pursue its Mission and Disseminate its Message; 3) The Ministerial Exception Safeguards a Trilogy of Core First Amendment Rights – Speech, Association and Religion; 4) Every Religious Association is Entitled to Define its Mission and Select Representatives to Disseminate its Message; 5) A Religious School Speaks a Message Inextricably Linked to its Mission. The School Must Retain the Exclusive Right to Select the Messenger; 6) A Religious Association Conveys its Message Not Only Through Speech, But Also the Conduct of its Representatives
  • Littlejohn v. School Bd of Leon Co. FLA (23-10385) (11th Cir) Parental Rights Foundation amicus in support of parents. Whether the District Court erred in ruling that the right of parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children is not clearly established as a fundamental right?
  • Foote, et al. v. Town of Ludlow, et al., (23-106) (1st Cir.) Parental Rights Foundation amicus in support of parents challenging public school policy that prohibits school from informing parents in matters where the school is assisting child to permanently change their sex.  Whether the government school’s policy unconstitutionally infringes on a Christian parent’s constitutional right to control and direct the upbringing of their child.

State Supreme Court Cases

  • In Re Bates (2024) (Michigan) representing HSLDA and Parental Rights Foundation. Whether the right of a parent to direct and control the upbringing of their child is a fundamental right of the highest order?
  • In the Matter of D.N. Dailey (2024) (Michigan) representing HSLDA and Parental Rights Foundation. Whether the right of a parent to direct and control the upbringing of their child is a fundamental right of the highest order?
  • Scardina v. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Inc and Jack Phillips., (2023) (Colorado) representing members of the Colorado legislature in support of Christian baker repeatedly facing government sanction for exercising sincerely held religious conscience.  Whether the government action yet again violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Praise Report – Colorado Supreme Ct Rules for Christian Baker
  • Scardina v. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Inc and Jack Phillips., (2023) (Colorado) representing members of the Colorado legislature in support of Christian baker repeatedly facing government sanction for exercising sincerely held religious conscience.  Whether the Court should grant review to determine whether the government action yet again violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Praise Report – Colorado Supreme Ct Rules for Christian Baker

Federal Executive Actions Impacting Christian Citizens

Federal Executive Actions impact Christian citizens. When these actions impact faith and freedom, or good governance we show up and let you know. Recent executive orders from the White House and other Federal Executive actions include:

Summary of All Other Executive Actions

State Executive Actions Impacting Christian Citizens



Public Comment Before Michigan Supreme Court

  • Amendment of Rule 1.109 of the Michigan Court Rules now directs judges to use pronouns preferred by parties and attorneys, even when doing so requires the judge to lie) Go HERE to hear Prof. Wagner’s testimony before the Supreme Court

Prof. Wagner’s and team’s Recent Testimony/Gov. Presentations/ Written Evidence

HF 22: Preserving Parental Rights & Protecting Children; non-partisan testimony presented before the Minnesota House of Representatives Committee on Children and Families (Feb 12, 2025)

Freedom to Educate Safe Updates

Here are recent updates from the American Association of Christian Schools (aacs.org) and the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities (cccu.org), and the Parental Rights Foundation (parentalrightsfoundation.org)

E.D. issues Guidelines Recognizing and Upholding Parental Rights

In a “Dear Colleague Letter” on March 28, the United States Department of Education’s Student Privacy Policy Office encouraged schools receiving federal funding to comply with the parental rights provisions in the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and the Protection of Pupils Rights Amendment. Per a press release on the Department’s website, Ed.gov, “Compliance with these laws means schools must allow parents to review all education records of their student, including any document related to a student’s ‘gender identity.’”

House Seeks to Increase Transparency of Foreign Gifts to Colleges

The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Deterrent Act (Defending Education Transparency and Ending Rogue Regimes Engaging in Nefarious Transactions), a bill that significantly tightens federal oversight of foreign gifts to colleges and universities. Introduced by Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R-WA-5), the legislation passed in a 241–169 vote. If signed into law, it would:

* Lower the reporting threshold for foreign gifts from $250,000 to $50,000,
* Require institutions to report all gifts from “countries of concern”, (e.g., China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea), and
*Ban contracts with those countries unless granted a waiver by the Secretary of State.

Colleges failing to comply face fines or loss of federal funding. Supporters of the bill argue it promotes accountability and protects academic institutions from foreign influence. “Transparency and accountability are essential in safeguarding American universities from the influence of foreign adversaries,” Baumgartner said.

E.D. Urges State to Use Funds to Expand School Choice Options

The U.S. Department of Education issued a guidance letter to all chief state school officers encouraging states to leverage Title I funds to expand parental choice in education. Title I, part of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), provides supplemental federal funding to districts with high numbers of low-income students. While these funds are typically directed by local education agencies (LEAs), the guidance highlights a provision allowing states to set aside up to 3% of Title I funds for direct student services—programs designed to enhance academic outcomes and expand educational options.

Eligible services include advanced coursework, dual enrollment, academic tutoring, career and technical education, personalized learning, and out-of-school activities. Although states cannot mandate how LEAs use Title I dollars, they can set priorities that encourage investment in school choice initiatives. Currently, Ohio is the only state using this flexibility to support choice-based programs. “Whether it’s credit recovery programs, advanced coursework, or expanding career pathways, the goal is the same for every Ohio student—to meet their full potential,” said Stephen Dackin, director of the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce.

The guidance letter follows the President’s executive order on Expanding Educational Freedom and Opportunities for Families which instructed the Secretary of Education to “issue guidance regarding how States can use Federal formula funds to support K-12 educational choice initiatives.”The Department indicated this is the first in a series of letters that will outline additional opportunities for states to expand choice through existing federal programs.

Use the Search icon to find previous Law & Public Policy Updates


pray together

Prayer Guide

Good Governance

Be subject for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether it be to the emperor as supreme, or to governors as sent by him to punish those who do evil and to praise those who do good. For this is the will of God, that by doing good you should put to silence the ignorance of foolish people. Live as people who are free, not using your freedom as a cover-up for evil, but living as servants of God. Honor everyone. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the emperor. (1 Peter 2:13-17)
  • Pray that God will raise up Godly men and women to serve in government agencies, the legislature and the judicial system at both the state and federal levels.
  • Pray that governmental, legislative and judicial leaders that don’t currently have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ would experience a spiritual revival and turn to Christ.
  • Pray that any attempts to limit an individual’s rights especially in regards to religious expression, marriage, family and personal property would be thwarted.
  • Pray that believers would have courage to boldly protect and speak out against any proposed rules, policy or legislation that would infringe on an individual’s God-given rights.
  • Pray that believers would commit to regularly loving, honoring and serving their leaders.

Protection of Traditional Marriage and the Family

“Therefore, a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.” Genesis 2:24
“Behold, children are a heritage from the LORD, the fruit of the womb a reward. Like arrows in the hand of a warrior are the children of one’s youth. Blessed is the man who fills his quiver with them! He shall not be put to shame when he speaks with his enemies in the gate.”  Psalm 127:3
  • Pray that legislation, regulations and policy that serve to break down the institutions of traditional marriage and the family would be blocked.
  • Pray that God would protect Christian marriages and families and that they would serve as a light to those who are need of a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.
  • Pray believers will boldly stand-up against attempts to indoctrinate children and youth through the educational system in values that are contrary to the Biblical view of marriage and the family.
  • Pray for protection for pastors, educators, governmental leaders and business leaders who uphold the values of traditional marriage and the family.
  • Pray for Christian parents to have wisdom as they disciple their kids in Biblical values related to marriage and family in a secular culture.
  • Pray for believers to live a righteous life that is pleasing to the Lord and free from the entanglements of pornography and sexual sins. Pray for a repentant heart for those who are caught in the cycle of sexual sin and the strength to seek the Christian professional help they need to experience freedom.

Value of Human Life

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.” (Genesis 1:27)
  • Pray that our culture would grasp and uphold the value of all human life born and unborn.
  • Pray that Roe v. Wade would not return under the guise of state constitutional and statutory law
  • Pray that state legislatures would be successful in adopting laws that protect all human life from the womb to the grave.
  • Pray that the Body of Christ would experience unity as we view every person as a beautiful and valuable creation designed in God’s image.
  • Pray that those who are victims of human trafficking are rescued and restored through the hope of Christ and those who are committing the crimes of human trafficking are captured and brought to justice.

Religious Liberty

“Beloved, although I was very eager to write to you about our common salvation, I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints. For certain people have crept in unnoticed who long ago were designated for this condemnation, ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into sensuality and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.” (Jude 1:3-4)
  • Pray that any attempt to pass laws or regulations that would limit the practice of religious freedom and expression would be thwarted.
  • Pray that attempts to censor the voices of believers would be unsuccessful. That the truth of the Gospel would continue to be boldly proclaimed in our nation.
  • Pray that evangelical churches would remain true to the fidelity of scripture. That they would not allow cultural beliefs and ideologies to taint the power and truth of God’s Word.
  • Pray that God would strengthen, encourage and protect pastors as they preach God’s Word and shepherd their churches. Pray that pastors would boldly proclaim the Gospel and not compromise the truth of God’s Word even when pressured by the culture and governmental leaders and policies.
  • Pray that believers would carefully study and obey God’s Word on a regular basis.
  • Pray that our nation would experience a spiritual revival and turn back to God and His Word.

Contact the Governor:

Mail:

Governor Gretchen Whitmer
P.O. Box 30013,
Lansing, Michigan 48909

Phone:

517-373-3400
517-335-7858 (Constituent Services)

About the Author

Prof. William Wagner
WFFC Distinguished Chair for Faith & Freedom at SAU
Professor Wagner holds the WFFC Distinguished Chair for Faith & Freedom at Spring Arbor University. He has a special interest in building and preserving environments where Christians may share the Good News of Jesus, free from persecution and oppression.

More On

This Issue